Clinical Practice Guidelines and Recommendations on Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy 2011

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Peritoneal dialysis and cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

OBJECTIVE To review the clinical associations between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and cough. METHODOLOGY A literature review was performed on PubMed for articles published between 1983 and 2004 using the search terms "dialysis" and "cough." RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving PD are more likely to develop a cough than other patients with end-stage renal disease who are receiving hemodialysi...

متن کامل

Ispd Guidelines / Recommendations Peritoneal Dialysis - Related Infections Recommendations : 2010 Update

Department of Medicine and Therapeutics,1 Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,2 Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Faculdade de Enfermagem, Nutrição e Fisioterapia,3 Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences,4 Lucknow, India; Department of Nephrology,...

متن کامل

The CARI Guidelines – Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment Dialysis Adequacy – Peritoneal Dialysis

a. Patients receiving automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) treatment report significantly more time for work, family and social activities (Level II evidence; single good quality RCT, clinically relevant outcome, strong precise effect). APD should be prescribed in preference to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) for patients in whom minimising the time spent performing peritoneal d...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis

سال: 2011

ISSN: 0896-8608,1718-4304

DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00026